MORPHOMETRIC TRAITS OF Apis dorsata WORKER BEES OF JOGIMATTI FOREST AND CHITRADURGA. KARNATAKA - INDIA

  • S. G. DHANANJAYA Department of Zoology, Government Science College, Chitradurga, Karnataka- 577501, India.
  • K. ROOPA Department of Biochemistry, Government Science College, Chitradurga, Karnataka- 577501, India.
  • I. RAMESH Department of Zoology, Government Science College, Chitradurga, Karnataka- 577501, India.
  • K. L. NAIK Zoology Department, Sahyadri Science College (Aut), Shivamogga, Kuvempu University, Karrnataka- 577201, India.
Keywords: Apis dorsata, worker bees, morphometry, Jogimatti, Chitradurga

Abstract

A few selected morphological traits of A. dorsata worker bees were analysed after collecting worker bees from two different areas in Chitradurga District present in central part of Karnataka. A total of 13 phenotypic characters were measured in the collected samples. The antenna, tongue, fore wing, hind wing, fore leg, mid leg and hind leg showed significant length variation between the workers bees [P < 0.05]. However, the reaming morphological traits showed insignificant variation [P > 0.05]. Observations revealed that there is a considerable relationship between the some morphological traits and the location of A. dorsata worker bees collected from the study areas suspecting morphometric variations perhaps discriminate intraspecific groups of honeybee colonies. Morphometry a simple, basic tool of taxonomy provides foundation information in understanding honeybee biodiversity.

References

Hargasim O. Bees as pollinators of entomophilous crops. Bee World. 1974;55(4): 137-140.

Michener CD. The social behaviour of the bees: A comparative study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 1974.

Mortensen AN, Smith B, Ellis JD. The Social Organization of Honey Bees. ENY-166. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences; 2015.

Crane E, Luyen Vu Van, Mulder V, Ta Tran Cong. Traditional Management System for Apis dorsata in Submerged Forests in Southern Vietnam and Central Kalimantan, Bee World. 1993;74:27–40.

Chinh PH, Thai PH, Minh NH, Tan NQ. Raftering, a traditional technique for honey and wax production from Apis dorsata in Vietnam, Beekeeping and Development. 1995;36:8–9.

Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia. 1999;121(3):432–40.

Mahindre DB. Developments in the management of Apis dorsata colonies, Bee World. 2000;81:155–163.

Haddad N, Mahmud Batainh A, Suleiman Migdadi O, Saini D, Krishnamurthy V, Parameswaran S, et al. Next generation sequencing of Apis mellifera syriaca identifies genes for Varroa resistance and beneficial bee keeping traits. Insect science. 2016;23(4):579–90.

Seely TD. Labour specialization by workers. Honeybee Ecology. Prinecton: New Jersy. 1985;31-35.

Otis GW. Diversity of Apis in Southeast Asia. In Vearesh GK, Malik B, Viraktanathan H (Eds.), Social insects and Environment. Oxford: IBA; 1990.

Michener CD. The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, New York, New York; 2000.

Nieh JC. The role of scent beacon in the communication of food location by the stingless bee, Melipona panamica. Behaviour Ecology Sociobiology.1998;43:47-58.

Nieh JC, Roubik DW. Potential mechanisms for the communication of height and distance by a stingless bee, Melipona panamica. Behaviour Ecology Sociobiology. 1998;43: 387-399.

Lindauer M. Communication among social bees. Cambridge: Harvard University; 1996.

Wongsiri S, Limpipichai K, Tangkanasing P, Mardan,M, Rinderer T, Sysvester HA, et al. Evidence of reproductive isolation confirms that Apis andreniformis is a separate species from sympatric Apis florea (Fabricius, 1787). Apidologie. 1990;31: 3-7.

Wongsiri S, Thapa R, Oldroyd B, Burgett DM. A magic bee tree: home to Apis dorsata. American Bee Journal. 1996;136:796-799.

Suwannapong G, Wongsiri S. Ultrastructure of the compound eyes of the giant honey bee queens, Apis dorsata Fabricius, 1793. Journal STREC. 1999;7(1-2): 60-68.

Suwannapong G, Chaiwongwattanakul S, Benbow ME. Histochemical comparision of the hypopharyngeal gland in Apis cerana Fabricius, 1793 and Apis mellifera Linneaus, 1758 Workers. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology; 2010.

Wongsiri S, Deowanish S, Thapa R. Some behavior diversity of Apis dorsata, Apis florea and Apis andreniformis. Proc. 14th Int. Cong. IUS; 2001.

Woyke J, Wilde J, Wilde M, Sivaram V, Cervancia C, Nagaraja N, Reddy M. Comparison of defense body movements of Apis laboriosa, and Apis dorsata breviligula honeybees. J. Insect Behav. 2008;21:481–494.

Corlett, R. T. Honeybees in natural ecosystems. In: Honeybees of Asia. (Edn. Hepburn, R. and S.E. Radloff). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 2011;215–226.

Partap U. The pollination role of honeybees. In: Honeybees of Asia. (Edn. Hepburn R and S.E. Radloff). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 2011;227–256.

Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmarks data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge Press;1991.

Daly HV. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1985;30(1): 415- 438.

MacLeod N, Forey PL. Morphology, Shape, and Phylogeny. London : CRC Press; 2002.

Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. A Revolution in Morphometrics, Trends Ecol Evol. 1993; 8:129–132.

Ruttner F. Queen rearing: Biological basis and technical instruction. Apimondia Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania; 1983.

Rinderer TE, Sylvester HA, Brown MA, Villa JD, Pesante D, Collins MA. Field and simplified techniques for identifying Africanized and European bees, Apidologie. 1986;17:33–48.

Jain PC. Morphometrics of bees Apis dorsata F., Apis indica F., Apis florea F., Meghachile lanata F., Trigona smithii B (Hymenoptera, Apidae) and their foraging habits at Udaipur, Thesis, University of Udaipur;1967.

Singh A. Morphometric studies on Apis dorsata F. and Bombus heamorrhidalis S. of Simla Hills (Himachal Pradesh), Thesis, Himachal Pradesh University Simla; 1981.

Sharma PC. Morphometric studies on Apis florea F. of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab,, Thesis, Himachal Pradesh University Simla; 1983.

Mujumdar S, Kshirsagar KK. Morphometric characterization of Apis dorsata F. workers, Indian Bee Journal. 1986;48:25-29.

Kastberger G, Sharma Dk, Huttinger E, Kranner G. Morphometric studies of Apis dorsata in Assam, India, Proc.7th Int. Conf. Apic.Trop.Clim., Chiang Mai. 2001;129.

Basavarajappa S, Bidhisha R. Morphometric Analysis of giant honeybee, Apis Ddorsata worker bees of different Areas of Mysore District, Karnataka, India. IOSR-JPBS. 2016; 11(6):07-12.

Harisha MN, Ajay GA, Kumar MD, Hosetti BB. Floristic and avifaunal diversity of Jogimatti State Forest, Chitradurga, Karnataka, My Forest. 2008;44(3):225–35.

Adl MBF, Gencer HV, Firati C, Bahreini R. Morphometric characterization of Iranian (Apis mellifera meda), Central Anatolian (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) and Caucasian (Apis mellifera caucasica) honeybee populations. J. Apic. Res. 2007;46:225-231.

Pearson K. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philos Mag Ser. 1900;50: 157-75.

Buco SM, Rinderer TE, Sylvester HA, Collins AM, Lancaster VA, Crewe RM. Morphometric differences between South American Africanized and South African [Apis mellifera scutellata] honey bees. Apidologie. 1987;18: 217-222.

Ruttner F.Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees Springer Verlag, Berlin;1988.

Rinderer TE, Buco SM, Rubink WL, Daly HV, Stelszer JA, Rigio RM, Baptista C. Morphometric identification of Africanized and European honey bees using large reference populations. Apidologie. 1993;24: 569-585.

Meixner DM, Miroslaw W, Jerzy W, Fuchs S, Nicholas K. Apis mellifera range in Eastern Europe – morphometric variation and determination of its limits. Apidologie. 2007; 38:1-7.

Aytekin AM, Terzo M, Rasmont P, Agatay NC. Landmark based geometric morphometric analysis of wing shape in Sibiri cobombus Vogt [Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus latreille]. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 2007;43:95-102.

Francisco FO, Nunes-Silva P, Francoy TM, Wittmann D, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Arias MC, Morgan ED. Morphometric, biochemical and molecular tools for assessing biodiversity: An example in Plebeia remota (Holmberg, 1903) (Apidae, Meliponini). Insectes Soc. 2008;55:231-237.

Francoy TM, Silva RAO, Nunes-Silva P, Menezes C, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. Gender identification of five genera of sting less bees (Apidae, Meliponini) based on wing morphometry. Genet. Mol. Res. 2009;8:207-214.

Francoy TM, Prado PRR, Goncalves LS, Costa L, de Jong D. Morphometric differences in a single wing cell can discriminate Apis mellifera racial types. Apidologie. 2006;37:91-97.

Basavarajappa S. Status of natural colonies of Apis dorsata in maidan region of Karnataka. Indian Bee J. 1998;60(3):143-146.

Souza DC, Cruz CD, Campos L, Regazzi AJ. Correlation between honey production and some morphological traits in Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera). Ciência Rural, Santa Maria. 2002;32:869-871.

Amssalu B, Nuru A, Radloff SE, Hepburn HR. Multivariate morphometric analysis of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in Ethiopian region. Apidologie. 2004;35:71-81.

Radloff SE, Hepburn HR, Hepburn C, Fuchs S, Otis GW, Sein MM, et al. Multivariate morphometric analysis of Apis cerana of southern mainland Asia. Apidologie. 2005; 36:127-139.

Hepburn HR, Radloff SE, Otis GW, Fuchs S, Verma LR, Ken T, et al. Apis florea: Morphometric, classification and biography. Apidologie. 2005;36:359-376.

Rattanawanee A, Chanchao C, Wongsiri S. Morphometric and genetic variation of small dwarf honeybees Apis andreniformis Smith, 1858 in Thailand. Insectes Sci. 2007;14:451-460.

Andere C, Garcı´a C, Marinelli C, Cepeda R, Rodrı´quez EM, Palacio A. Morphometric variables of honeybees Apis mellifera used in ecotypes characterization in Argentina. Ecol. Model. 2008;214:53-58.

Marghitas AL, Paniti-Teleky O, Dezmirean D, Margaoan R, Bojan C, Coroian C, et.al. Morphometric diferences between honey bees (Apis mellifera carpatica) Populations from Transylvanian area. Zootehnie Si Biotehnologii. 2008;241:309-315.

Szymula J, Skowronek W, Bienkowska M. Use of various morphological traits measured by microscope or by computer methods in the honeybee taxonomy. J. Apic. Sci. 2010;54:91-97.

Raghunandan KS. Bio ecology of Apis dorsata Fabr. in few area of south western Karnataka. Ph.D. Thesis, Uni. Of Mysore, India; 2014.

Hassanein MH, El-Banby MA. Studies on the biometrics of the Egyptian honeybee, Apis mellifera fasciata L. (Hymenoptera: Apoidae). Bulletin Society Entomological Egypt. 1956;40:127-130.

Antontseva PV. Seasonal changes in external characters of local bees of the Dzhungarskii Alatau (mountains). Temat. Sborn. Nauch. Trud. Alma-Atin I Semipal, Zoovet, Institov. 1975;36:31-32.

Morimoto, H.The use of labial palps as a measure of proboscis length in worker honeybees, Apis mellifera ligustica and Apis cerana cerana. J. Apic. Res. 1968;7:147-150.

Fernando EFW. Some biometrical features of Apis cerana F. from Sri Lanka. Indian Bee Journal. 1979, 2001;41:5-8.

Hepburn RH, Radloff SE. The wing coupling apparatus and the morphometric analysis of honeybee populations. South African J. Sci. 2004;100: 565-569.

Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
DHANANJAYA, S. G., ROOPA, K., RAMESH, I., & NAIK, K. L. (2021). MORPHOMETRIC TRAITS OF Apis dorsata WORKER BEES OF JOGIMATTI FOREST AND CHITRADURGA. KARNATAKA - INDIA. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 42(14), 48-53. Retrieved from https://mbiimph.com/index.php/UPJOZ/article/view/2254
Section
Original Research Article